
The objective of this research was to determine the self-perceived level of development of digital teaching competence among faculty members at a public university in Mexico. The recognition of competence levels was carried out in the dimensions of communication, information, and digital resources. The study followed a non-experimental, cross-sectional design with a descriptive scope, employing a quantitative approach through an online questionnaire administered to a sample of 1,762 faculty members. The results indicate that the university level of competence development is intermediate, with variations across the assessed dimensions. The dimension with the lowest level of development is educational resources. It is concluded that the intermediate level of competence development is consistent with findings from other countries and that teacher training should incorporate higher-order taxonomic levels. Otherwise, faculty members will simply substitute one tool for another, missing opportunities to analyze and evaluate their teaching practices to modify or redefine them.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
