
doi: 10.36633/ulr.763
The Brussels IIa (Recast) Regulation – the long-anticipated revision of the 2003 Brussels II bis Regulation – has brought about significant changes to the EU’s jurisdictional rules that apply to cross-border matrimonial matters (divorce and legal separation) and matters of parental responsibility. However, the role of party autonomy – in this context, the opportunity for parties to the proceedings to designate a closely-connected jurisdiction – continues to be a divisive matter under this renewed instrument. Whilst the pre-existing possibility for parties to participate in the determination of jurisdiction for matters of parental responsibility has been fine-tuned by this recast, the new instrument negates to include a much-needed choice of court provision for cross-border divorce and legal separation. This omission has wide-ranging consequences, both for the use of the instrument itself, as well as for the possibility of coordination with jurisdictions that govern related proceedings.
choice of court, party autonomy, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, eu private international law, international family law, matrimonial matters, divorce and legal separation, parental responsibility, K1-7720, brussels ii bis regulation, brussels iia (recast) regulation
choice of court, party autonomy, Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence, eu private international law, international family law, matrimonial matters, divorce and legal separation, parental responsibility, K1-7720, brussels ii bis regulation, brussels iia (recast) regulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
