Background: Increased surgical volume is associated with better patient outcomes and shorter lengths of hospitalization. As a consequence, traveling to receive care from a high volume provider may be associated with better outcomes. However, travel may also be associated with a decision by the healthcare provider to increase the length of stay due to a decreased ability to return to the primary hospital should complications arise. Thus, research is needed to understand the relationship between the distance a patient must travel and their outcomes following urologic surgery. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the distance a patient travels to receive urologic surgery is associated with their length of hospital stay and direct medical hospitalization costs. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 12 106 patients over 50 years of age undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), radical prostatectomy (RP) or radical cystectomy (RC) in Washington State hospitals between 2009 and 2013. Distance traveled was determined by calculating the linear distance between zip code centroids of patient residence and the hospital performing their procedure. Patients were sorted into four groups classified by distance traveled (≤5 miles, 6-20 miles, 21-50 miles and ≥51 miles) and cost calculated using a charges-to-reimbursement ratio for each hospital. Statistical significance was determined using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Patients traveling greater distances had significantly lower median medical costs compared with patients who lived closer to the hospitals where they underwent TURP and RP (TURP: ≤5 miles, $6243 and ≥51 miles, $5105, p≤0.001; RP: ≤5 miles, $12 407 and ≥51 miles, $11 882, p≤0.001), whereas there was no significant difference for patients undergoing RC (≤5 miles, $27 554 and ≥51 miles, $26 761, p=0.17). Likewise, patients traveling greater distances had significantly lower median lengths of hospitalization for TURP and RP (TURP: p≤0.001, RP: p≤0.001), while there was no difference for RC (p=0.50). Conclusions: Patient travel burden does appear to play a role in cost and length of hospital stay for select urologic procedures with variable levels of morbidity and recovery time. Although these findings are statistically significant, the magnitude of the effect is small.