
doi: 10.36151/td.2021.031
handle: 10447/570909
Las prerrogativas parlamentarias son institutos necesarios para asegurar el equilibrio entre los poderes constitucionales, aunque no pueden ser entregados a la «total y exclusiva» decisión parlamentaria ni a la jurisdicción ordinaria porque, de lo contrario, podrían producir abusos y fuertes interferencias en el ejercicio de las atribuciones que corresponden al Parlamento o al poder judicial. En la experiencia italiana, la Corte Constitucional ha asumido un papel «arbitral» en los conflictos relacionados con las prerrogativas parlamentarias (el juicio por conflicto de atribuciones entre poderes del Estado y el juicio de legitimidad constitucional de las leyes en vía incidental). Sin embargo, falta la posibilidad de asegurar una total y efectiva tutela de los derechos de los terceros afectados por las prerrogativas, una carencia detectada en varias sentencias del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos.
Prerogatives, inviolabilidad, parliament, parlamento, poder judicial, Settore IUS/09 - Istituzioni Di Diritto Pubblico, inmunidad, K, immunity, judicial power, constitutional justice, constitutional conflicts, balance between constitutional powers, Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale, prerrogativas, inviolability, equality, Prerogatives, inviolability, immunity, parliament, judicial power, constitutional justice, constitutional conflicts, equality, balance between constitutional powers, constitutional rights., Law, constitutional rights, justicia constitucional
Prerogatives, inviolabilidad, parliament, parlamento, poder judicial, Settore IUS/09 - Istituzioni Di Diritto Pubblico, inmunidad, K, immunity, judicial power, constitutional justice, constitutional conflicts, balance between constitutional powers, Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale, prerrogativas, inviolability, equality, Prerogatives, inviolability, immunity, parliament, judicial power, constitutional justice, constitutional conflicts, equality, balance between constitutional powers, constitutional rights., Law, constitutional rights, justicia constitucional
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
