Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Jutisi Jurnal Ilmiah...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Analisis Usability Sistem Permohonan Legalisir Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale

Authors: Wahyudi Ariannor; Devia Rahma Safitri; Rustati Rahmi;

Analisis Usability Sistem Permohonan Legalisir Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale

Abstract

<p><em>One of the applications of e-Government in the districts is the application for legalization of documents that can be accessed widely. Since it was implemented, the application has never been evaluated for usability. So that the ease of use of the application can not be determined. The study measures the usability of quantitative applications using the System Usability Scale (SUS) method using a 10-item rating scale. Based on the test results, the usability value of general public application users has a "Good" value for an adjective rating and has a "D" scale for a grade scale. Meanwhile, the acceptability ranges are at a "High-Marginal" value. Then the usability value of the agency user gets the value "Good" for the adjective rating and has a "C" scale for the grade scale. The acceptability ranges are at a "High-Marginal" value. Aspects that are important to note for improvement or further application development are the aspects of errors and aspects of satisfaction.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keyword</em></strong><strong><em>:</em></strong><em> </em><em>A</em><em>nalisys; </em><em>S</em><em>atisfaction; </em><em>E</em><em>rrors; </em><em>U</em><em>ser experience</em><em></em></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Salah satu penerapan <em>e-Goverment</em> di kantor kecamatan adalah aplikasi permohonan legalisir dokumen yang dapat diakses secara luas. Sejak diimplementasikan, aplikasi belum pernah dilakukan evaluasi usability. Sehingga belum dapat dipastikan kemudahan penggunaan aplikasi oleh pengguna. Penelitian mengukur usability terhadap aplikasi kuantitatif menggunakan metode <em>System Usability Scale</em> (SUS) menggunakan 10 item skala penilaian. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian, nilai usability pengguna aplikasi masyarakat umum memiliki nilai <em>G</em><em>ood</em> untuk adjective rating dan memiliki skala “D” untuk grade scale. Sedangkan pada <em>acceptability ranges</em> berada pada nilai <em>High-Marginal</em>. Kemudian nilai <em>usability</em> pengguna instansi didapatkan nilai <em>G</em><em>ood</em> untuk <em>adjective rating</em> dan memiliki skala “C” untuk <em>grade scale</em>. Pada <em>acceptability ranges</em> berada pada nilai <em>High-Marginal</em>. Aspek yang penting untuk diperhatikan untuk perbaikan atau pengembangan aplikasi lebih lanjut adalah aspek <em>errors</em> dan aspek <em>satisfaction</em>.</p><p> </p>

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold