
doi: 10.35784/jcsi.7198
This article analyzes the performance of CRUD operations in two popular frameworks: Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core, evaluating speed, efficiency, and resource usage. Performance tests revealed that ASP.NET Core excels in CPU-intensive tasks, making it more suitable for applications requiring high computational efficiency. In contrast, Spring Boot offers more stable memory usage and better handling of complex queries, making it ideal for resource-constrained systems. The findings indicate that the choice of technology should depend on project requirements, and the paper provides practical guidance for optimizing the development of scalable applications.
Electronic computers. Computer science, CRUD, spring boot, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, performance comparison, T58.5-58.64, asp.net core
Electronic computers. Computer science, CRUD, spring boot, Information technology, QA75.5-76.95, performance comparison, T58.5-58.64, asp.net core
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
