Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Revista Arbitrada In...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria Koinonía
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria Koinonía
Article
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Predicción del rendimiento de cultivos agrícolas usando aprendizaje automático

Authors: Joel Junior García-Arteaga; Jesús Javier Zambrano-Zambrano; Roberth Alcivar-Cevallos; Walter Daniel Zambrano-Romero;

Predicción del rendimiento de cultivos agrícolas usando aprendizaje automático

Abstract

Se aborda la predicción del rendimiento de los cultivos a través del aprendizaje automático. Se usaron dos variables predictoras: hectáreas cosechadas, y producción en toneladas. Para el primer caso, el mejor modelo fue una arquitectura de red neuronal densa (DNN), con un MSE de 0.0081, seguido de los Random Forest (RF) con un MSE de 0.0104, árboles de decisión (AD) con 0.0168, y finalmente las máquinas de soporte vectorial (SVM) con 0.0328. Cuando se predijo producción en toneladas, el mejor modelo fue el de los RF con un MSE de 0.0550, seguidos de AD con 0.1418, DNN con 0.1489, y finalmente SVM con 0.3420. El test estadístico de diferencia significativa mostró que no existe tal diferencia entre el rendimiento de los modelos cuando se predice la variable hectáreas cosechadas, pero si para el caso de producción en toneladas, donde la capacidad predictiva de RF fue de 95% aproximadamente.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold