
doi: 10.35305/aa.v11i.3
handle: 2133/17302
Este ensayo plantea algunos interrogantes sobre la referencia del arte rupestre y su modelo epistémico. Confiere a éste un contenido heurístico importante y lo examina en relación con el enfoque lacaniano sobre los significantes. Intenta abordar la fenomenología de este arte con instrumentos analíticos que estima no pueden ser dejados de lado incluso ante manifestaciones tan elusivas como las rupestres.
Pensamiento rupestre, `Pensamiento Rupestre, Archaeology, Modelo de referencia, Arte rupestre, GN700-890, Modelo de la referencia, CC1-960, Prehistoric archaeology
Pensamiento rupestre, `Pensamiento Rupestre, Archaeology, Modelo de referencia, Arte rupestre, GN700-890, Modelo de la referencia, CC1-960, Prehistoric archaeology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
