
doi: 10.34961/8464
handle: 10344/5135
With the continued expansion of the European Union and the free movement of persons, there is potential for increased cross-border crime and the associated difficulties with concurrent prosecutorial jurisdictions for the same criminal offence. This dilemma may result in diplomatic resourcefulness through interstate relations and for the criminal justice professional (and academic alike) there is the increased likelihood for violations of the principle of ne bis in idem in criminal proceedings. This is particularly so in the absence of an international legal instrument for jurisdictional claims by more than one state (multiple or concurrent) pertaining to the prosecution of transnational crimes.1
peer-reviewed
ne bis in idem, conflicts of prosecutoral jurisdiction
ne bis in idem, conflicts of prosecutoral jurisdiction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
