Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://dx.doi.org/1...arrow_drop_down
https://dx.doi.org/10.34944/ds...
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Wear Study of Cubic Boron Nitride (cBN) Cutting Tool for Machining of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) with Different Metalworking Fluids

Wear Study of Cubic Boron Nitride (cBN) Cutting Tool for Machining of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) with Different Metalworking Fluids

Abstract

Due to its desirable mechanical properties, compacted graphite iron (CGI) has been used to replace conventional gray cast iron (CI) in various applications, such as automotive engine blocks and cylinder heads. However, the poor machinability of CGI can lead to excessive tool wear and consequently high manufacturing costs. Various strategies have been developed to improve the machinability of CGI, including optimizing machining parameters and the development of novel metalworking fluids. In this study, machining of CGI was conducted using cubic boron nitride (cBN) tools under different cutting speeds, with both soluble and full-synthetic water-based metalworking fluids at different levels of sulfur addition and water dilution. The effects of the metalworking fluids on the tool wear behavior were examined. Results showed that at 200 m/min cutting speed, the soluble metalworking fluid at 4% dilution and 0.3% sulfur compound exhibited the best performance, with a cutting distance reaching 23.8 km. In contrast, the least effective soluble metalworking fluid at 9% dilution and 0.3% sulfur compound resulted in a 28.6% decrease in the cutting distance (17.0 km) compared to the best one. At a higher speed (300 m/min), the cutting distance for all metalworking fluids dropped to less than 6.0 km, with the full-synthetic metalworking fluid showing the shortest cutting distance of 4.8 km.

Keywords

Wear, Compacted graphite iron (CGI), Cubic boron nitride (cBN), Metalworking fluid, Machining

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!