Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Identifying NFDI Consortia with Persistent Identifiers

Authors: El-Gebali, Sara; Kahlert, Torsten; Hagemann-Wilholt , Stephanie;

Identifying NFDI Consortia with Persistent Identifiers

Abstract

This document presents the official recommendation of the PID4NFDI Coordination Hub for assigning persistent identifiers (PIDs) to the consortia of Germany’s National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI). To ensure consistent, interoperable, and FAIR identification across the NFDI landscape, PID4NFDI recommends the use of DataCite Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) with the resource type “Project” as the authoritative identifiers for NFDI consortia. The proposed approach reflects the specific nature of NFDI consortia as collaborative, project-based alliances without independent legal status, which fall outside the scope of organizational PID systems such as ROR (Research Organization Registry). At the same time this approach avoids potential conflicts or problems with the German revenue administration. DataCite DOIs offer a mature, transparent, and provenance-controlled infrastructure that aligns with NFDI’s strategic goals for sustainable and machine-actionable metadata management. Complementary PID systems - including ROR for participating institutions, Wikidata IRIs for semantic integration into the Linked Open Data ecosystem, and RAiD (Research Activity Identifier) for tracking project relationships once operational in Germany - are acknowledged as part of a layered and interoperable PID framework for the future. By adopting this model for the time being, NFDI strengthens the discoverability, attribution, and long-term accessibility of its research consortia, ensuring their integration within the global PID ecosystem and alignment with international best practices in research infrastructure governance.

Keywords

NFDI, 020, Recommendation, persistent identifiers

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!