Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

ASSESSMENT OF EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN TUBAL-PERITONEAL INFERTILITY

Authors: Manh Linh Tran; Quang Vinh Truong; Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen; Ngoc Thanh Cao;

ASSESSMENT OF EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN TUBAL-PERITONEAL INFERTILITY

Abstract

Objective: To determine some causes and affecting factors of tubal-peritoneal infertility. To assess the efficacy of laparoscopy in treating tubal-peritoneal infertility. Methods: Prospective study in 126 patients with tubal-peritoneal infertility. Results: Main causes of tubal infertility: Infection: 42.7%, history of operation: 25.6%, endometriosis: 12.8% and other causes and undetermined causes: 18.9%. 79.5% patients have patent tubes through hysterosalpingography. The rate of false obstructed tube through hysterosalpingography was 7.1%. The rate of intrauterine pregnancy after laparoscopy was 21.4%. This rate was associated with the stage of tubal lesons and the highest rate was in the first stage (68.0%). Nobody can get pregnant with the tubal lesions in the third and fourth stage or severe adheson. Conclusion: Main causes of tubal infertility are infection, history of operation and endometriosis. The rate of intrauterine pregnancy and patent tubes in this study is equivalent to some national and international studies. This rate is associated with the stage of tubal le-sions and the degree of tubal adhesion.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!