Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Advances in Forestry...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Advances in Forestry Science
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Repeatability and genetic dissimilarity using biometric characteristics of black wattle seeds

Authors: Flôres Junior, Paulo César; Ikeda, Angela Cristina; Schuhli, Guilherme Schnell; Silva, Luciana Duque; Higa, Antonio Rioyei;

Repeatability and genetic dissimilarity using biometric characteristics of black wattle seeds

Abstract

Selecting superior individuals requires a careful genetic evaluation. For this reason, repeated measurements of biometrical characteristics need to be carried out in the same individual. The repeatability of the measurements is represented in the repeatability coefficient. This index is a strategic tool to assists the accuracy of the observations and further selection. Our objectives were: to estimate the repeatability coefficient in many seed characteristics for black wattle clones; to test the best method to estimate the optimal number of measurements required; and to analyze genetic dissimilarity. Seed weight, longitudinal length, transversal length, thickness and hilum dimensions in 50 seeds of each one of nine clones were evaluated. The characteristics were evaluated using analysis of variance and of principal component method based on correlation and covariance matrix, and structural analysis. Mahalanobis distance and graphic dispersion were generated to evaluate genetic dissimilarity. We concluded that the most effective method to determine the repeatability coefficient was PCA based on covariance matrix. To achieve a 90% determination coefficient 20 measurements are needed. Based in our measures of genetic dissimilarity it was possible to differentiate clones among themselves and to recognize two genetically distinct groups.

Keywords

Acacia mearnsii, numbers of mensurements, principal components analysis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold