
Contrary to the Dutch pattern that considers Rhine Europe as the origin of the Bell Beaker culture, the author places the genesis of the maritime beaker in southern Europe, at the heart of Late Neolithic (or Chalcolithic) cultures. Towards the middle of the 3rd millennium ВС, two areas would thus be distinguished: on the one hand, a western Mediterranean and Iberian sphere with international-style beakers, active metallurgy and collective graves and, on the other, a northern sphere marked by the custom of the individual tomb (cf. also Central Europe) and the permanence of lithic traditions (cf. Grand-Pressigny), perforated axes and large beakers derived from the Corded style. The later spread of the Bell Beaker culture to a large part of Europe hardly changed the burial traditions of the autochthonous substrata. Each wide European area affected by this phenomenon coped with the Bell Beaker process according to its specific codes and values: this statement of fact means that any overall explanation attempts are likely to be dubious.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
