
Under the section Scientific Productivity, the 2010 report of the External Evaluation of INDEPTH recommended that ‘INDEPTH must campaign and work for fuller exploitation of sites’ data, but should not impose specific research topics on sites. As a supplementary strategy to the comparative studies pursued by Working Groups, it might consider commissioning a series of ‘‘Illustrative Analyses’’. This would entail an analyst working with one site’s data, producing a research paper on a strategically important topic that demonstrates to other sites what they can potentially achieve with such data. Backup documentation of how to produce the results would be helpful’. (Published: 30 August 2010) Citation: Global Health Action Supplement 1, 2010. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5469
Supplement 1, 2010, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
Supplement 1, 2010, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
