Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Basrah journal of en...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Basrah journal of engineering science
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Effect of Loading Level and Span Length on Critical Buckling Load

Authors: Marwah Mohsen; Abdalnassre Abbas; Ahmed Saadoon;

Effect of Loading Level and Span Length on Critical Buckling Load

Abstract

An investigation was conducted to study the effect ofloading level with respect to shear center and span length onlateral torsional buckling of steel I-section beams using linearand nonlinear finite element analysis available in ANSYS(version 12.0) computer program. The steel beams which havebeen studied included prismatic beams and linearly web tapered beams with web tapering ratio of (0.5). The maximumheight of all beams was 300 mm with span length of 4, 6 and 8m. The critical buckling loads for prismatic and linearlytapered cantilever and simply supported beams subjected topoint load and uniformly distributed load were determined.The results showed that the bottom flange loading gives abuckling loads higher than that of the top flange loading withpercentage increases of 148% and 155% for the linear andnonlinear analysis respectively for the prismatic beams. Whilefor the tapered beams, these percentages increases were 61%and 67% respectively

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold