
doi: 10.3397/in_2023_0786
The laboratory method (ISO 10140-2:2021) is probably the most accurate method to determine the sound reduction index R of walls. Flanking noise (ISO 10848-1 and 4:2017) is almost fully eliminated in the laboratory setup whereas this is not the case for in situ measurements (ISO 10052:2021). The measurements are even more difficult for measurements in open air or in factory halls with mock-up setups. Manufactures of building elements, such as prefabricated walls, are interested in quick measurements of the sound reduction index R of their products. This paper compares the traditional laboratory measurements, the intensity method and the Sopranoise road barrier method (EN 1793-6) with the vibration velocity / sound pressure method (ISO 140-4:1998). Different setups were measured using different methods in laboratory and in open air. Most of the experiments were done with loudspeakers used as an excitation source, but some were also done with shakers and a tapping machine. The importance of the use of sound shielded accelerometers will be elucidated.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
