
Traditionally, virus taxonomy relied on phenotypic properties; however, a sequence-based virus taxonomy has become essential since the recent requirement of a species to exhibit monophyly. The species Cowpox virus has failed to meet this requirement, necessitating a reexamination of this species. Here, we report the genomic sequences of nine Cowpox viruses and, by combining them with the available data of 37 additional genomes, confirm polyphyly of Cowpox viruses and find statistical support based on genetic data for more than a dozen species. These results are discussed in light of the current International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses species definition, as well as immediate and future implications for poxvirus taxonomic classification schemes. Data support the recognition of five monophyletic clades of Cowpox viruses as valid species.
polyphyly, Poxviridae, phylogenomics, monophyly, Vaccinia virus, Genome, Viral, Genomics, misnomers, Microbiology, QR1-502, Article, Cell Line, smallpox, taxonomy, <i>Cowpox virus</i>; smallpox; <i>Vaccinia virus</i>; poxvirus; phylogenomics; monophyly; polyphyly; species delimitation; taxonomy; misnomers, species delimitation, poxvirus, Animals, Cowpox virus, Phylogeny
polyphyly, Poxviridae, phylogenomics, monophyly, Vaccinia virus, Genome, Viral, Genomics, misnomers, Microbiology, QR1-502, Article, Cell Line, smallpox, taxonomy, <i>Cowpox virus</i>; smallpox; <i>Vaccinia virus</i>; poxvirus; phylogenomics; monophyly; polyphyly; species delimitation; taxonomy; misnomers, species delimitation, poxvirus, Animals, Cowpox virus, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
