
Sequence determination of complete or coding-complete genomes of viruses is becoming common practice for supporting the work of epidemiologists, ecologists, virologists, and taxonomists. Sequencing duration and costs are rapidly decreasing, sequencing hardware is under modification for use by non-experts, and software is constantly being improved to simplify sequence data management and analysis. Thus, analysis of virus disease outbreaks on the molecular level is now feasible, including characterization of the evolution of individual virus populations in single patients over time. The increasing accumulation of sequencing data creates a management problem for the curators of commonly used sequence databases and an entry retrieval problem for end users. Therefore, utilizing the data to their fullest potential will require setting nomenclature and annotation standards for virus isolates and associated genomic sequences. The National Center for Biotechnology Information’s (NCBI’s) RefSeq is a non-redundant, curated database for reference (or type) nucleotide sequence records that supplies source data to numerous other databases. Building on recently proposed templates for filovirus variant naming [<virus name> (<strain>)/<isolation host-suffix>/<country of sampling>/<year of sampling>/<genetic variant designation>-<isolate designation>], we report consensus decisions from a majority of past and currently active filovirus experts on the eight filovirus type variants and isolates to be represented in RefSeq, their final designations, and their associated sequences.
virus strain, Letter, genome annotation, marburgvirus, virus nomenclature, bat, virus variant, Ebola virus, ICTV, Bundibugyo virus, Chiroptera, Ebola virus (EBOV), Lloviu virus, Virus isolate, cDNA clone, virus classification, Chordata, Ravn virus, Marburg virus, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), 005, Biodiversity, Ebolavirus, <i>Mononegavirales</i>, Virus nomenclature, Virus strain, QR1-502, Cuevavirus, Sudan virus, Ebola, RefSeq, Reston virus, Mammalia, Databases, Nucleic Acid, cuevavirus, filovirus, 570, filovirid, bats, virus taxonomy, Microbiology, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, 576, Evolution, Molecular, Virus variant, reverse genetics, Humans, Animalia, virus isolate, Selection, Genetic, ebolavirus, Mononegavirus, Virus classification, mononegavirus, Virus taxonomy, mononegavirad, 2725 Infectious Diseases, Filovirid, Filoviridae, Filovirus, Marburgvirus, Reverse genetics, <i>Filoviridae</i>, 2406 Virology, Mononegavirales, Taï Forest virus, Genome annotation
virus strain, Letter, genome annotation, marburgvirus, virus nomenclature, bat, virus variant, Ebola virus, ICTV, Bundibugyo virus, Chiroptera, Ebola virus (EBOV), Lloviu virus, Virus isolate, cDNA clone, virus classification, Chordata, Ravn virus, Marburg virus, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), 005, Biodiversity, Ebolavirus, <i>Mononegavirales</i>, Virus nomenclature, Virus strain, QR1-502, Cuevavirus, Sudan virus, Ebola, RefSeq, Reston virus, Mammalia, Databases, Nucleic Acid, cuevavirus, filovirus, 570, filovirid, bats, virus taxonomy, Microbiology, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, 576, Evolution, Molecular, Virus variant, reverse genetics, Humans, Animalia, virus isolate, Selection, Genetic, ebolavirus, Mononegavirus, Virus classification, mononegavirus, Virus taxonomy, mononegavirad, 2725 Infectious Diseases, Filovirid, Filoviridae, Filovirus, Marburgvirus, Reverse genetics, <i>Filoviridae</i>, 2406 Virology, Mononegavirales, Taï Forest virus, Genome annotation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
