
arXiv: 2308.16624
The various “defect wormholes” developed by Klinkhamer have recently attracted considerable attention—especially in view of the fact that the simplest example, the so-called “vacuum defect wormhole”, was claimed to be an everywhere-vacuum everywhere-Ricci-flat exact solution to the Einstein equations. This claim has been conclusively refuted by Feng, and in the current article, we take a deeper look at exactly what goes wrong. The central issue is this: Although Klinkhamer’s specific representation of the metric gab is smooth (C∞), his inverse metric gab is not even everywhere continuous (C0), being undefined at the wormhole throat. This situation implies that one should very carefully investigate curvature tensors at the throat using the Israel–Lanczos–Sen thin-shell formalism. Doing so reveals the presence of a delta-function energy-condition-violating thin shell of matter at the wormhole throat. The “defect wormholes” are thus revealed to be quite ordinary “cut-and-paste” thin-shell wormholes, but represented in a coordinate system that is unfortunately pathological at exactly the same place that all the interesting physics occurs. To help clarify the situation, we shall focus on the behavior of suitable coordinate invariants—the Ricci scalar, the eigenvalues of the mixed Rab Ricci tensor, and the eigenvalues of the mixed Rabcd Riemann tensor.
Israel–Lanczos–Sen formalism, thin-shell construction, energy conditions, Elementary particle physics, FOS: Physical sciences, QC793-793.5, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), wormholes, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Israel–Lanczos–Sen formalism, thin-shell construction, energy conditions, Elementary particle physics, FOS: Physical sciences, QC793-793.5, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), wormholes, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
