
Dashcams are considered video sensors, and the number of dashcams installed in vehicles is increasing. Native dashcam video players can be used to view evidence during investigations, but these players are not accepted in court and cannot be used to extract metadata. Digital forensic tools, such as FTK, Autopsy and Encase, are specifically designed for functions and scripts and do not perform well in extracting metadata. Therefore, this paper proposes a dashcam forensics framework for extracting evidential text including time, date, speed, GPS coordinates and speed units using accurate optical character recognition methods. The framework also transcribes evidential speech related to lane departure and collision warning for enabling automatic analysis. The proposed framework associates the spatial and temporal evidential data with a map, enabling investigators to review the evidence along the vehicle’s trip. The framework was evaluated using real-life videos, and different optical character recognition (OCR) methods and speech-to-text conversion methods were tested. This paper identifies that Tesseract is the most accurate OCR method that can be used to extract text from dashcam videos. Also, the Google speech-to-text API is the most accurate, while Mozilla’s DeepSpeech is more acceptable because it works offline. The framework was compared with other digital forensic tools, such as Belkasoft, and the framework was found to be more effective as it allows automatic analysis of dashcam evidence and generates digital forensic reports associated with a map displaying the evidence along the trip.
video artifacts, Chemical technology, digital forensics, dashcams, TP1-1185, Article
video artifacts, Chemical technology, digital forensics, dashcams, TP1-1185, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
