
doi: 10.3390/s20185362
pmid: 32962134
pmc: PMC7571227
handle: 11564/828523 , 11575/164425 , 11382/536476 , 11393/289881
doi: 10.3390/s20185362
pmid: 32962134
pmc: PMC7571227
handle: 11564/828523 , 11575/164425 , 11382/536476 , 11393/289881
Background: Heartbeat detection is a crucial step in several clinical fields. Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) is a promising non-contact measurement for heartbeat detection. The aim of this work is to assess whether machine learning can be used for detecting heartbeat from the carotid LDV signal. Methods: The performances of Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) were compared using the leave-one-subject-out cross-validation as the testing protocol in an LDV dataset collected from 28 subjects. The classification was conducted on LDV signal windows, which were labeled as beat, if containing a beat, or no-beat, otherwise. The labeling procedure was performed using electrocardiography as the gold standard. Results: For the beat class, the f1-score (f1) values were 0.93, 0.93, 0.95, 0.96 for RF, DT, KNN and SVM, respectively. No statistical differences were found between the classifiers. When testing the SVM on the full-length (10 min long) LDV signals, to simulate a real-world application, we achieved a median macro-f1 of 0.76. Conclusions: Using machine learning for heartbeat detection from carotid LDV signals showed encouraging results, representing a promising step in the field of contactless cardiovascular signal analysis.
laser doppler vibrometry, contactless measurements, Support Vector Machine, Chemical technology, Lasers, Contactless measurements; Heart rate detection; Heartbeat; Laser doppler vibrometry; Machine learning; Support vector machines, TP1-1185, laser doppler vibrometry; machine learning; support vector machines; contactless measurements; heartbeat; heart rate detection, Vibration, support vector machines, Article, Machine Learning, Electrocardiography, machine learning, Heart Rate, heart rate detection, Humans, contactless measurements; heart rate detection; heartbeat; laser doppler vibrometry; machine learning; support vector machines, heartbeat
laser doppler vibrometry, contactless measurements, Support Vector Machine, Chemical technology, Lasers, Contactless measurements; Heart rate detection; Heartbeat; Laser doppler vibrometry; Machine learning; Support vector machines, TP1-1185, laser doppler vibrometry; machine learning; support vector machines; contactless measurements; heartbeat; heart rate detection, Vibration, support vector machines, Article, Machine Learning, Electrocardiography, machine learning, Heart Rate, heart rate detection, Humans, contactless measurements; heart rate detection; heartbeat; laser doppler vibrometry; machine learning; support vector machines, heartbeat
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
