
doi: 10.3390/s20143885
pmid: 32668584
pmc: PMC7411775
handle: 11588/817640 , 11386/4887249 , 1959.7/uws:56632
doi: 10.3390/s20143885
pmid: 32668584
pmc: PMC7411775
handle: 11588/817640 , 11386/4887249 , 1959.7/uws:56632
This paper presents forcecardiography (FCG), a novel technique to measure local, cardiac-induced vibrations onto the chest wall. Since the 19th century, several techniques have been proposed to detect the mechanical vibrations caused by cardiovascular activity, the great part of which was abandoned due to the cumbersome instrumentation involved. The recent availability of unobtrusive sensors rejuvenated the research field with the most currently established technique being seismocardiography (SCG). SCG is performed by placing accelerometers onto the subject’s chest and provides information on major events of the cardiac cycle. The proposed FCG measures the cardiac-induced vibrations via force sensors placed onto the subject’s chest and provides signals with a richer informational content as compared to SCG. The two techniques were compared by analysing simultaneous recordings acquired by means of a force sensor, an accelerometer and an electrocardiograph (ECG). The force sensor and the accelerometer were rigidly fixed to each other and fastened onto the xiphoid process with a belt. The high-frequency (HF) components of FCG and SCG were highly comparable (r > 0.95) although lagged. The lag was estimated by cross-correlation and resulted in about tens of milliseconds. An additional, large, low-frequency (LF) component, associated with ventricular volume variations, was observed in FCG, while not being visible in SCG. The encouraging results of this feasibility study suggest that FCG is not only able to acquire similar information as SCG, but it also provides additional information on ventricular contraction. Further analyses are foreseen to confirm the advantages of FCG as a technique to improve the scope and significance of pervasive cardiac monitoring.
non-invasive sensor, Seismocardiography, heart, TP1-1185, Cardiac monitoring, Vibration, Article, Electrocardiography, seismocardiography, XXXXXX - Unknown, Accelerometry, Force-sensitive resistor, Humans, Thoracic Wall, Monitoring, Physiologic, cardiac monitoring, Chemical technology, Cardiac function, 621, Heart, Non-invasive sensor, force-sensitive resistor, monitoring, Cardiac function; Cardiac monitoring; Force-sensitive resistor; Non-invasive sensor; Seismocardiography, cardiac function, tactile sensors
non-invasive sensor, Seismocardiography, heart, TP1-1185, Cardiac monitoring, Vibration, Article, Electrocardiography, seismocardiography, XXXXXX - Unknown, Accelerometry, Force-sensitive resistor, Humans, Thoracic Wall, Monitoring, Physiologic, cardiac monitoring, Chemical technology, Cardiac function, 621, Heart, Non-invasive sensor, force-sensitive resistor, monitoring, Cardiac function; Cardiac monitoring; Force-sensitive resistor; Non-invasive sensor; Seismocardiography, cardiac function, tactile sensors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
