
Nowadays, accurate and robust localization is preliminary for achieving a high autonomy for robots and emerging applications. More and more, sensors are fused to guarantee these requirements. A lot of related work has been developed, such as visual-inertial odometry (VIO). In this research, benefiting from the complementary sensing capabilities of IMU and cameras, many problems have been solved. However, few of them pay attention to the impact of different performance IMU on the accuracy of sensor fusion. When faced with actual scenarios, especially in the case of massive hardware deployment, there is the question of how to choose an IMU appropriately? In this paper, we chose six representative IMUs with different performances from consumer-grade to tactical grade for exploring. According to the final performance of VIO based on different IMUs in different scenarios, we analyzed the absolute trajectory error of Visual-Inertial Systems (VINS_Fusion). The assistance of IMU can improve the accuracy of multi-sensor fusion, but the improvement of fusion accuracy with different grade MEMS-IMU is not very significant in the eight experimental scenarios; the consumer-grade IMU can also have an excellent result. In addition, the IMU with low noise is more versatile and stable in various scenarios. The results build the route for the development of Inertial Navigation System (INS) fusion with visual odometry and at the same time, provide a guideline for the selection of IMU.
sensor fusion, MEMS applications, TJ1-1570, Mechanical engineering and machinery, MEMS-IMU, visual-inertial odometry, Article, MEMS-IMU; visual-inertial odometry; sensor fusion; MEMS applications
sensor fusion, MEMS applications, TJ1-1570, Mechanical engineering and machinery, MEMS-IMU, visual-inertial odometry, Article, MEMS-IMU; visual-inertial odometry; sensor fusion; MEMS applications
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
