
doi: 10.3390/math9121426
handle: 11577/3399307 , 11311/1204039
A unified discretization framework, based on the concept of augmented dual grids, is proposed for devising hybrid formulations which combine the Cell Method and the Boundary Element Method for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field problems. It is shown that hybrid approaches, already proposed in literature, can be rigorously formulated within this framework. As a main outcome, a novel direct hybrid approach amenable to iterative solution is derived. Both direct and indirect hybrid approaches, applied to an axisymmetric model, are compared with a reference third-order 2D FEM solution. The effectiveness of the indirect approach, equivalent to the direct approach, is finally tested on a fully 3D benchmark with more complex topology.
Finite element method, Cell method, finite element method, magnetostatics, Magnetodynamics, Electromagnetic, boundary element method, Boundary element method; Cell method; Coupling; Eddy– currents; Electromagnetic; Finite element method; Hybrid method; Magnetodynamics; Magnetostatics, Coupling, eddy–currents, Eddy– currents, electromagnetic, magnetodynamics, QA1-939, Boundary element method, Hybrid method, hybrid method, cell method, coupling, Magnetostatics, Mathematics
Finite element method, Cell method, finite element method, magnetostatics, Magnetodynamics, Electromagnetic, boundary element method, Boundary element method; Cell method; Coupling; Eddy– currents; Electromagnetic; Finite element method; Hybrid method; Magnetodynamics; Magnetostatics, Coupling, eddy–currents, Eddy– currents, electromagnetic, magnetodynamics, QA1-939, Boundary element method, Hybrid method, hybrid method, cell method, coupling, Magnetostatics, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
