
doi: 10.3390/math9050523
A formal model of an imprecise number can be given as, inter alia, a fuzzy number or oriented fuzzy numbers. Are they formally equivalent models? Our main goal is to seek formal differences between fuzzy numbers and oriented fuzzy numbers. For this purpose, we examine algebraic structures composed of numerical spaces equipped with addition, dot multiplication, and subtraction determined in a usual way. We show that these structures are not isomorphic. It proves that oriented fuzzy numbers and fuzzy numbers are not equivalent models of an imprecise number. This is the first original study of a problem of a dissimilarity between oriented fuzzy numbers and fuzzy numbers. Therefore, any theorems on fuzzy numbers cannot automatically be extended to the case of oriented fuzzy numbers. In the second part of the article, we study the purposefulness of a replacement of fuzzy numbers by oriented fuzzy numbers. We show that for a portfolio analysis, oriented fuzzy numbers are more useful than fuzzy numbers. Therefore, we conclude that oriented fuzzy numbers are an original and useful tool for modelling a real-world problems.
ordered fuzzy number; oriented fuzzy number; Kosiński’s number; imprecision measure; portfolio diversification, ordered fuzzy number, portfolio diversification, Kosiński’s number, QA1-939, imprecision measure, Mathematics, oriented fuzzy number
ordered fuzzy number; oriented fuzzy number; Kosiński’s number; imprecision measure; portfolio diversification, ordered fuzzy number, portfolio diversification, Kosiński’s number, QA1-939, imprecision measure, Mathematics, oriented fuzzy number
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
