
doi: 10.3390/math7070628
handle: 10045/94469
In this paper, we illustrate the paradox concerning maximally consistent sets of propositions, which is contrary to set theory. It has been shown that Cantor paradoxes do not offer particular advantages for any modal theories. The paradox is therefore not a specific difficulty for modal concepts, and it also neither grants advantages nor disadvantages for any modal theory. The underlying problem is quite general, and affects anyone who intends to use the notion of “world” in its ontology.
Sets, paradoxes, Actualism, Matemática Aplicada, possible worlds, Cantor theorem, actualism, QA1-939, Paradoxes, Possible worlds, sets, Mathematics
Sets, paradoxes, Actualism, Matemática Aplicada, possible worlds, Cantor theorem, actualism, QA1-939, Paradoxes, Possible worlds, sets, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
