
doi: 10.3390/math13162548
This study addresses the critical challenge of optimizing coal pillar width in burst-prone mines with thick, hard roof strata, balancing resource recovery, roadway stability, and coal burst mitigation. Through integrated analytical modeling and rigorously calibrated numerical simulations, the research reveals the complex interplay between pillar width, roof mechanics, and stress redistribution. Key findings demonstrate that pillar width dictates roof failure mechanics and energy accumulation. The case study indicates that increasing the coal pillar width from 6 m to 20 m shifts the tensile fracture location from solid coal toward the pillar center, migrates shear failure zones closer to roadways, and relocates elastic strain energy accumulation to the pillar area. This concentrates static and dynamic loads directly onto wider pillars upon roof fracture, escalating instability risks. A risky coal pillar width is identified as 10–20 m, where pillars develop severe lateral abutment pressures perilously close to roadways, combining high elastic energy storage with exposure to roof fracture dynamics. Conversely, narrow pillars exhibit low stress concentrations and limited energy storage due to plastic deformation, reducing burst potential despite requiring robust asymmetric support. Strategic selection of narrow or wide pillars provides a safer pathway. The validated analytical–numerical framework offers a scientifically grounded methodology for pillar design under hard roof conditions, enhancing resource recovery while mitigating coal burst risks.
numerical simulation, coal pillar width, hard roof, ground control, 49 Mathematical Sciences, Hard roof, Abutment stress, Coal pillar width, Numerical simulation, Ground control, abutment stress
numerical simulation, coal pillar width, hard roof, ground control, 49 Mathematical Sciences, Hard roof, Abutment stress, Coal pillar width, Numerical simulation, Ground control, abutment stress
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
