
In the most common literature about fractional calculus, we find that Dtαaft=It−αaft is assumed implicitly in the tables of fractional integrals and derivatives. However, this is not straightforward from the definitions of Itαaft and Dtαaft. In this sense, we prove that Dt0ft=It−α0ft is true for ft=tν−1logt, and ft=eλt, despite the fact that these derivations are highly non-trivial. Moreover, the corresponding formulas for Dtα−∞t−δ and Itα−∞t−δ found in the literature are incorrect; thus, we derive the correct ones, proving in turn that Dtα−∞t−δ=It−α−∞t−δ holds true.
Weyl fractional integral, General Mathematics (math.GM), Weyl fractional derivative, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, 26A33, Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative, Mathematics - General Mathematics, Mathematics, Riemann–Liouville fractional integral
Weyl fractional integral, General Mathematics (math.GM), Weyl fractional derivative, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, 26A33, Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative, Mathematics - General Mathematics, Mathematics, Riemann–Liouville fractional integral
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
