
doi: 10.3390/math12010102
Shape From Focus (SFF) reconstructs a scene’s shape using a series of images with varied focus settings. However, the effectiveness of SFF largely depends on the Focus Measure (FM) used, which is prone to noise-induced inaccuracies in focus values. To address these issues, we introduce a perception-influenced factor to refine the traditional Focus Volume (FV) derived from a traditional FM. Owing to the strong relationship between the Difference of Gaussians (DoG) and how the visual system perceives edges in a scene, we apply it to local areas of the image sequence by segmenting the image sequence into non-overlapping blocks. This process yields a new metric, the Perceptual Focus Factor (PFF), which we combine with the traditional FV to obtain an enhanced FV and, ultimately, an enhanced depth map. Intensive experiments are conducted by using fourteen synthetic and six real-world data sets. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated using quantitative measures, such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and correlation. For fourteen synthetic data sets, the average RMSE measure of 6.88 and correction measure of 0.65 are obtained, which are improved through PFF from an RMSE of 7.44 and correlation of 0.56, respectively. Experimental results and comparative analysis demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms the traditional state-of-the-art FMs in extracting depth maps.
shape from focus, focus measure, perceptual focus factor, directional ring difference filter, QA1-939, depth map, Mathematics
shape from focus, focus measure, perceptual focus factor, directional ring difference filter, QA1-939, depth map, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
