
In the shape-from-focus (SFF) method, the quality of the 3D shape generated relies heavily on the focus measure operator (FM) used. Unfortunately, most FMs are sensitive to noise and provide inaccurate depth maps. Among recent FMs, the ring difference filter (RDF) has demonstrated excellent robustness against noise and reasonable performance in computing accurate depth maps. However, it also suffers from the response cancellation problem (RCP) encountered in multidimensional kernel-based FMs. To address this issue, we propose an effective and robust FM called the directional ring difference filter (DRDF). In DRDF, the focus quality is computed by aggregating responses of RDF from multiple kernels in different directions. We conducted experiments using synthetic and real image datasets and found that the proposed DRDF method outperforms traditional FMs in terms of noise handling and producing a higher quality 3D shape estimate of the object.
focus measure, ring difference filter, QA1-939, 3D shape recovery, shape-from-focus, depth map, Mathematics, focus measure; shape-from-focus; ring difference filter; depth map; 3D shape recovery
focus measure, ring difference filter, QA1-939, 3D shape recovery, shape-from-focus, depth map, Mathematics, focus measure; shape-from-focus; ring difference filter; depth map; 3D shape recovery
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
