Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Machine Learning and...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2026
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

vinum-Analytics

Authors: Nuno Ferreira; Filipe Pinto 0001; António Valente; Diana Augusto; Manuela Reis; Salviano Soares;

vinum-Analytics

Abstract

Old-vine vineyards often contain dozens of grapevine varieties intermingled and irregularly distributed, making plant-level varietal identification slow and expensive when based on ampelography or molecular approaches. This paper proposes a field-oriented computer-vision pipeline for Vitis vinifera variety identification using images with a natural background from the historic “Vinha Maria Teresa” parcel (Quinta do Crasto, Portugal). A single-class YOLO11 detector is trained to localize the vine leaf and generate standardized crops, and a YOLO11 classifier is then fine-tuned on leaf regions of interest (ROIs) for eight selected varieties in the Douro UNESCO region. We annotated 2015 vineyard images for classification and supplemented detection training with 2648 additional leaf images; detectors (YOLO11n/s/m) were benchmarked under four augmentation regimes and evaluated on a fixed 48-image subset, including runtime on CPU and GPU. The best detector reached mAP@50–95 of 0.918 on the benchmark, while YOLO11n achieved ∼27 FPS on CPU for fast cropping. On a 303-image test set, the best classifier (YOLO11s with mixed augmentations) achieved 94.06% Top-1 accuracy, 93.92% macro-F1, and 100% Top-5 accuracy with remaining errors concentrated among morphologically similar varieties. To assess deployment-oriented performance, classifiers trained under three input settings (manual crops, detector-generated crops, and full images) were evaluated on a held-out 48-image benchmark subset; removing the detection step reduced Top-1 accuracy from 75.00% to 68.75%, while the gap between manual and automatic crops was only 2.44 pp on successfully detected images with detection failures (14.6%) representing the primary operational bottleneck. Repeated retraining of the best manual-crop YOLO11s configuration across multiple random seeds showed stable performance with low variability in Top-1 accuracy and macro-F1. Under identical training conditions, ResNet50 and EfficientNet-B0 provided competitive baselines, but YOLO11s remained the strongest overall model on the held-out field benchmark. These results indicate that lightweight leaf detection plus crop-based classification can support scalable varietal identification in old vineyards under realistic acquisition conditions.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average