
doi: 10.3390/make5040072
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promise in optimizing complex control and decision-making processes but Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) lacks interpretability, limiting its adoption in regulated sectors like manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. Difficulties arise from DRL’s opaque decision-making, hindering efficiency and resource use, this issue is amplified with every advancement. While many seek to move from Experience Replay to A3C, the latter demands more resources. Despite efforts to improve Experience Replay selection strategies, there is a tendency to keep the capacity high. We investigate training a Deep Convolutional Q-learning agent across 20 Atari games intentionally reducing Experience Replay capacity from 1×106 to 5×102. We find that a reduction from 1×104 to 5×103 doesn’t significantly affect rewards, offering a practical path to resource-efficient DRL. To illuminate agent decisions and align them with game mechanics, we employ a novel method: visualizing Experience Replay via Deep SHAP Explainer. This approach fosters comprehension and transparent, interpretable explanations, though any capacity reduction must be cautious to avoid overfitting. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of reducing Experience Replay and advocates for transparent, interpretable decision explanations using the Deep SHAP Explainer to promote enhancing resource efficiency in Experience Replay.
TK7885-7895, SHapley Additive exPlanations, Computer engineering. Computer hardware, deep reinforcement learning, experience replay, eXplainable artificial intelligence
TK7885-7895, SHapley Additive exPlanations, Computer engineering. Computer hardware, deep reinforcement learning, experience replay, eXplainable artificial intelligence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
