
Concrete 3D printing is a sustainable solution for manufacturing efficient designs and creating less waste, and selecting the optimal materials to use can amplify the advantages of this technology. In this study, we explore printing lightweight concrete by replacing normal weight aggregate with lightweight aggregates such as cenospheres, perlite, and foam beads. We adopt a systematic approach to investigate mixtures using different formulation methods such as the specific gravity and packing factor methods to improve the printing and mechanical performances of the mixtures. The rheological results showed significant improvement in the flow characteristics of the different mixtures using both the specific gravity method and the packing factor method to formulate the mixtures. Furthermore, a statistical tool was used to achieve optimal performance of the mixtures in terms of high specific compressive strength, high flow characteristics, and good shape retention capability by maximizing the specific compressive strength ratio, slump flow, and the static yield stress, while minimizing the slump, dynamic yield stress, and plastic viscosity. With the above design objectives, the optimal percentages of the aggregate replacements (cenosphere, perlite, and EPS foam beads) were 42%, 68%, and 44%, respectively. Finally, the optimized results also showed that the mixture with cenosphere aggregate replacement had the highest specific strength.
rheology, packing factor, lightweight materials, additive manufacturing, 3D concrete printing, Article
rheology, packing factor, lightweight materials, additive manufacturing, 3D concrete printing, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
