
Wildfires are increasing in extent and severity under anthropogenic climate change, with potential adverse impacts on native pollinators like wild bees. In 2019/2020, wildfires burned swathes of the Australian bushland. Whilst herbaceous angiosperms may flower in the post-fire environment, providing sustenance to native bees, pre-made holes created by wood-boring beetles that obligate cavity-nesting “renter” bees may take a longer time to recover. This may prevent native bees from colonising new areas or reduce the populations that have survived. To date, trap-nests, also known as bee hotels, have never been used as a tool to assist in providing nesting resources in post-fire environments. The project “Bee hotels to boost bees after bushfires” supported the recovery of native bee populations by installing artificial nesting substrates (bee hotels) in areas of high biodiversity value that were impacted by the 2019/2020 bushfires. This was achieved through monitoring of 1000 bee hotels (500 bamboo and 500 wooden) and visual surveys at five burnt sites and three control sites (nearby burnt sites without bee hotels) by a native bee ecologist from September–March 2021/2022. The bee hotel uptake was low initially, but by March, all hotels were occupied. Over 800 nests were created by bees in the bee hotels installed for this project and significantly more bees were observed in sites with bee hotels compared to control sites. Across sites, there was a significant negative association between honeybee density and nest occupancy, suggesting honeybees may be exerting competitive pressure on native bees in post-fire habitats. In conclusion, bee hotels, if designed correctly, can aid in boosting cavity-nesting bee populations following fires.
restoration, post-fire, Science, Q, conservation, native bees, bees, fire, Article
restoration, post-fire, Science, Q, conservation, native bees, bees, fire, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
