
doi: 10.3390/g4030367
handle: 10419/98567
I use data from a previous experiment for classifying subjects based on their behavior in the trust game. Prior literature defines a “reciprocity effect” as the tendency for Second Movers to return proportions increasing in the amounts that they receive. In the data that I use, 31% of Second Movers show reciprocity effects, 31% are neutral, and 25% consistently free-ride, indicating that the aggregate reciprocity effect for the sample as a whole is attributable to a minority of the subjects.
Technology, strategy method, ddc:330, T, Social Sciences, Experimental studies, trust game; reciprocity; strategy method, H, reciprocity, trust game, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:C71, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:C73, jel: jel:C, jel: jel:C7
Technology, strategy method, ddc:330, T, Social Sciences, Experimental studies, trust game; reciprocity; strategy method, H, reciprocity, trust game, jel: jel:C70, jel: jel:C71, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:C73, jel: jel:C, jel: jel:C7
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
