Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Firearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Fire
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Inferring Wildfire Ignition Causes in Spain Using Machine Learning and Explainable AI

Authors: Clara Ochoa; Magí Franquesa; Marcos Rodrigues; Emilio Chuvieco;

Inferring Wildfire Ignition Causes in Spain Using Machine Learning and Explainable AI

Abstract

A substantial proportion of wildfires in Mediterranean regions continue to be recorded without information about the cause or source of ignition, limiting our ability to understand ignition drivers and design effective prevention strategies. In this study, we develop a spatially harmonised wildfire database for mainland Spain by integrating ignition records from the Spanish General Fire Statistics (EGIF) with fire perimeters generated from satellite images. We then apply a Random Forest classifier to infer ignition causes for events lacking cause attribution. To interpret model behaviour, we use Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values at both global and local scales. Results indicate that human-caused ignitions are dominant, with intentional and negligence-related fires accounting for 52.13% of all known events, although they are associated with contrasting climatic and land-use settings. Negligence-related fires tend to occur under hot, dry and windy conditions, often in agricultural interfaces, whereas intentional fires are more frequent under cooler and wetter conditions and in areas with higher population density and land-use change. Lightning-caused fires represent a small fraction of total ignitions (3%) but exhibit a distinct climatic signature, occurring primarily in sparsely populated areas, under intermediate moisture conditions, and often leading to larger burned areas. Despite strong overall model performance (F1-score = 0.82), minority classes (e.g., lightning and fire rekindling, 0.17%) remain challenging to classify, reflecting both data imbalance and uncertainty in causal attribution. Overall, the combined use of machine learning and explainable AI provides a coherent spatial characterisation of wildfire ignition drivers across mainland Spain, highlights systematic differences among ignition causes, and identifies key limitations in existing fire cause records. This framework represents a practical step towards improving fire cause information by integrating remote sensing products with field-based fire reports, thereby supporting more targeted and evidence-based fire risk management.

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average