Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Electronicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Electronics
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

PWFS: Probability-Weighted Feature Selection

Authors: Mehmet B. Ayanoglu; Ismail Uysal;

PWFS: Probability-Weighted Feature Selection

Abstract

Feature selection has been a fundamental research area for both conventional and contemporary machine learning since the beginning of predictive analytics. From early statistical methods, such as principal component analysis, to more recent and data-driven approaches, such as deep unsupervised feature learning, selecting input features to achieve the best objective performance has been a critical component of any machine learning application. In this study, we propose a novel, easily replicable, and robust approach called probability-weighted feature selection (PWFS), which randomly selects a subset of features prior to each training–testing regimen and assigns probability weights to each feature based on an objective performance metric such as accuracy, mean-square error, or area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC–ROC). Using the objective metric scores and weight assignment techniques based on the golden ratio led iteration method, the features that yield higher performance are incrementally more likely to be selected in subsequent train–test regimens, whereas the opposite is true for features that yield lower performance. This probability-based search method has demonstrated significantly faster convergence to a near-optimal set of features compared to a purely random search within the feature space. We compare our method with an extensive list of twelve popular feature selection algorithms and demonstrate equal or better performance on a range of benchmark datasets. The specific approach to assigning weights to the features also allows for expanded applications in which two correlated features can be included in separate clusters of near-optimal feature sets for ensemble learning scenarios.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold