
With the development of modern technology, many people work for a long time around various artificial light sources and electronic equipment, causing them to feel discomfort in their eyes and even eye diseases. The industry currently lacks an objective quantitative environmental–visual comfort index that combines subjective and objective indicators. For this experiment, objective eye movement and electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected in combination with a subjective questionnaire survey and a preference inquiry for comprehensive data mining. Finally, the results on a Likert scale show that high screen brightness can reduce the visual fatigue of subjects under high illuminance and high correlated color temperature (CCT). Pupil data show that, under medium and high ambient illuminance, visual perception sensitivity is more likely to be stimulated, and visual fatigue is more likely to deepen. EEG data show that visual fatigue is related to illuminance and screen brightness. On this basis, this study proposes a new evaluation index, the visual comfort level (0.6404 average at a low screen brightness, 0.4218 average at a medium screen brightness, and 0.5139 average at a high screen brightness), where a higher score for the visual comfort level represents a better visual experience. The visual comfort level provides a useful reference for enhancing the processing of multi-dimensional and biomedical signals and protecting the eyes.
visual comfort level, light sources, screen brightness, EEG, pupil
visual comfort level, light sources, screen brightness, EEG, pupil
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
