
arXiv: 2301.11773
Automatic modulation classification is an important component in many modern aeronautical communication systems to achieve efficient spectrum usage in congested wireless environments and other communications systems applications. In recent years, numerous convolutional deep learning architectures have been proposed for automatically classifying the modulation used on observed signal bursts. However, a comprehensive analysis of these differing architectures and the importance of each design element has not been carried out. Thus, it is unclear what trade-offs the differing designs of these convolutional neural networks might have. In this research, we investigate numerous architectures for automatic modulation classification and perform a comprehensive ablation study to investigate the impacts of varying hyperparameters and design elements on automatic modulation classification accuracy. We show that a new state-of-the-art accuracy can be achieved using a subset of the studied design elements, particularly as applied to modulation classification over intercepted bursts of varying time duration. In particular, we show that a combination of dilated convolutions, statistics pooling, and squeeze-and-excitation units results in the strongest performing classifier achieving 98.9% peak accuracy and 63.7% overall accuracy on the RadioML 2018.01A dataset. We further investigate this best performer according to various other criteria, including short signal bursts of varying length, common misclassifications, and performance across differing modulation categories and modes.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, machine learning, convolutional neural networks, automatic modulation classification, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, machine learning, convolutional neural networks, automatic modulation classification, Machine Learning (cs.LG)
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
