Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Education Sciencesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Education Sciences
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Towards Digital Transformation in University Teaching: Diagnosis of the Level and Profile of Digital Competence Based on the DigCompEdu and OpenEdu Frameworks Among University Lecturers in Chile

Authors: Irma Riquelme-Plaza; Jesús Marolla-Gajardo;

Towards Digital Transformation in University Teaching: Diagnosis of the Level and Profile of Digital Competence Based on the DigCompEdu and OpenEdu Frameworks Among University Lecturers in Chile

Abstract

This study diagnoses the level and profile of university lecturers’ digital competence at a Chilean higher education institution, drawing on the DigCompEdu and OpenEdu frameworks. A non-experimental correlational design was used, based on a self-perception questionnaire adapted from the DigCompEdu Check-In tool and administered to 569 lecturers through the Qualtrics platform. The instrument underwent external expert validation and demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). Results indicate that 44% of lecturers position themselves at the “Integrator” level, 22% at the “Explorer” level, and 19% at the “Expert” level, with three clearly differentiated competence profiles. These findings informed the development of a structured training programme centred on three components: the pedagogical use of digital technologies, the incorporation of open educational practices aligned with OpenEdu, and the strengthening of students’ digital competence. The programme includes modular workshops, mentoring led by high-competence lecturers, and the creation of open educational resources. Overall, the study provides empirical evidence to guide institutional policies and to foster a reflective, ethical, and pedagogically grounded integration of digital technologies in university teaching.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold