
In this study, the PennyLane quantum device simulator was used to investigate quantum and hybrid, quantum/classical physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solutions to both transient and steady-state, 1D and 2D partial differential equations. The comparative expressibility of the purely quantum, hybrid and classical neural networks is discussed, and hybrid configurations are explored. The results show that (1) for some applications, quantum PINNs can obtain comparable accuracy with less neural network parameters than classical PINNs, and (2) adding quantum nodes in classical PINNs can increase model accuracy with less total network parameters for noiseless models.
Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, quantum machine learning, quantum variational algorithm, physics informed neural networks, Astrophysics, quantum computing, Article, QB460-466, quantum data-derived methods, quantum algorithms
Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, quantum machine learning, quantum variational algorithm, physics informed neural networks, Astrophysics, quantum computing, Article, QB460-466, quantum data-derived methods, quantum algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
