<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
We explore unique considerations involved in fitting machine learning (ML) models to data with very high precision, as is often required for science applications. We empirically compare various function approximation methods and study how they scale with increasing parameters and data. We find that neural networks (NNs) can often outperform classical approximation methods on high-dimensional examples, by (we hypothesize) auto-discovering and exploiting modular structures therein. However, neural networks trained with common optimizers are less powerful for low-dimensional cases, which motivates us to study the unique properties of neural network loss landscapes and the corresponding optimization challenges that arise in the high precision regime. To address the optimization issue in low dimensions, we develop training tricks which enable us to train neural networks to extremely low loss, close to the limits allowed by numerical precision.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, machine learning; ML for science; scaling laws; optimization, Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph), Astrophysics, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, machine learning, scaling laws, ML for science, optimization, Physics - Computational Physics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, machine learning; ML for science; scaling laws; optimization, Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph), Astrophysics, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, machine learning, scaling laws, ML for science, optimization, Physics - Computational Physics
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |