
doi: 10.3390/e15041152
Persistent misconceptions existing for dozens of years and influencing progress in various fields of science are sometimes encountered in the scientific and especially, the popular-science literature. The present brief review deals with two such interrelated misconceptions (misunderstandings). The first misunderstanding: entropy is a measure of disorder. This is an old and very common opinion. The second misconception is that the entropy production minimizes in the evolution of nonequilibrium systems. However, as it has recently become clear, evolution (progress) in Nature demonstrates the opposite, i.e., maximization of the entropy production. The principal questions connected with this maximization are considered herein. The two misconceptions mentioned above can lead to the apparent contradiction between the conclusions of modern thermodynamics and the basic conceptions of evolution existing in biology. In this regard, the analysis of these issues seems extremely important and timely as it contributes to the deeper understanding of the laws of development of the surrounding World and the place of humans in it.
Jaynes’s maximization, Measures of information, entropy, Prigogine's principle, Science, QC1-999, Physics, Q, Foundations of thermodynamics and heat transfer, Astrophysics, Prigogine’s principle, QB460-466, Ziegler's principle, applicability of MEPP, biological evolution, Jaynes's maximization, Ziegler’s principle
Jaynes’s maximization, Measures of information, entropy, Prigogine's principle, Science, QC1-999, Physics, Q, Foundations of thermodynamics and heat transfer, Astrophysics, Prigogine’s principle, QB460-466, Ziegler's principle, applicability of MEPP, biological evolution, Jaynes's maximization, Ziegler’s principle
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 140 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
