
Recently, pre-trained deep learning (DL) models have been employed to tackle and enhance the performance on many tasks such as skin cancer detection instead of training models from scratch. However, the existing systems are unable to attain substantial levels of accuracy. Therefore, we propose, in this paper, a robust skin cancer detection framework for to improve the accuracy by extracting and learning relevant image representations using a MobileNetV3 architecture. Thereafter, the extracted features are used as input to a modified Hunger Games Search (HGS) based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Dynamic-Opposite Learning (DOLHGS). This modification is used as a novel feature selection to alloacte the most relevant feature to maximize the model’s performance. For evaluation of the efficiency of the developed DOLHGS, the ISIC-2016 dataset and the PH2 dataset were employed, including two and three categories, respectively. The proposed model has accuracy 88.19% on the ISIC-2016 dataset and 96.43% on PH2. Based on the experimental results, the proposed approach showed more accurate and efficient performance in skin cancer detection than other well-known and popular algorithms in terms of classification accuracy and optimized features.
medical diagnosis, medical diagnosis; skin cancer; Hunger Games Search (HGS); Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); deep learning, Medicine (General), R5-920, skin cancer, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), deep learning, Hunger Games Search (HGS), Article
medical diagnosis, medical diagnosis; skin cancer; Hunger Games Search (HGS); Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); deep learning, Medicine (General), R5-920, skin cancer, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), deep learning, Hunger Games Search (HGS), Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
