
arXiv: 2205.13206
The present paper concerns the design of the semantic infrastructure of the data space for cultural heritage as envisaged by the European Commission in its recent documents. Due to the complexity of the cultural heritage data and of their intrinsic inter-relationships, it is necessary to introduce a novel ontology, yet compliant with existing standards and interoperable with previous platforms used in this context as Europeana. The data space organization must be tailored to the methods and the theory of cultural heritage, briefly summarized in the introduction. The new ontology is based on the Digital Twin concept, i.e., the digital counterpart of cultural heritage assets incorporating all the digital information pertaining to them. This creates a Knowledge Base on the cultural heritage data space. The paper outlines the main features of the proposed Heritage Digital Twin ontology and provides some examples of its application. Future work will include completing the ontology in all its details and testing it in other real cases and with the various sectors of the cultural heritage community.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, cultural heritage data space, E.2, I.3.7, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, cultural heritage semantics, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, E.2; H.3.2; H.3.7; I.3.7, Computer Science - Computers and Society, H.3.2, digital twin, Computers and Society (cs.CY), H.3.7, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Z
FOS: Computer and information sciences, cultural heritage data space, E.2, I.3.7, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, cultural heritage semantics, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, E.2; H.3.2; H.3.7; I.3.7, Computer Science - Computers and Society, H.3.2, digital twin, Computers and Society (cs.CY), H.3.7, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Z
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
