Reliable precipitation data are fundamental for climate and hydrological research, especially in regions with sparse ground-based observations. This study evaluates and compares the accuracy of two satellite-based precipitation products—CMORPH and GPCP—across daily, monthly, and annual scales over Iran. Daily, monthly, and annual precipitation estimates from CMORPH and GPCP were validated against observations from 128 meteorological stations distributed throughout the country. The assessment employed two statistical indices—correlation coefficient (CC) and root mean square error (RMSE)—alongside three categorical indices: probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), and critical success index (CSI). At the daily scale, CMORPH outperformed GPCP in terms of CC, RMSE, POD, and CSI, while GPCP exhibited a lower FAR. At the monthly scale, correlations between satellite-derived and station-based precipitation were stronger than those at the daily scale; CMORPH achieved the highest correlation (CC = 0.84), whereas GPCP yielded a lower RMSE, with a mean value of 26.2 mm. At the annual scale, GPCP demonstrated better performance in CC, while CMORPH showed superior accuracy in RMSE. CMORPH consistently underestimated precipitation, whereas GPCP tended to overestimate rainfall across Iran. Although both datasets provided reliable precipitation estimates at the national scale, CMORPH demonstrated higher overall accuracy and efficiency. Its superior performance across most indices makes CMORPH the more suitable dataset for precipitation monitoring in Iran, despite its tendency to underestimate rainfall relative to ground observations.