
The multiplexed detection of disease biomarkers is part of an ongoing effort toward improving the quality of diagnostic testing, reducing the cost of analysis, and accelerating the treatment processes. Although significant efforts have been made to develop more sensitive and rapid multiplexed screening methods, such as microarrays and electrochemical sensors, their limitations include their intricate sensing designs and semi-quantitative detection capabilities. Alternatively, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based single-molecule counting offers great potential for both the sensitive and quantitative detection of various biomarkers. However, current FRET-based multiplexed sensing typically requires the use of multiple excitation sources and/or FRET pairs, which complicates labeling schemes and the post-analysis of data. We present a nanotweezer (NT)-based sensing strategy that employs a single FRET pair and is capable of detecting multiple targets. Using DNA mimics of miRNA biomarkers specific to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we demonstrated that the developed sensors are sensitive down to the low picomolar range (≤10 pM) and can discriminate between targets with a single-base mismatch. These simple hybridization-based sensors hold great promise for the sensitive detection of a wider spectrum of nucleic acid biomarkers.
multiplex sensing, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, DNA, biosensors, single-molecule FRET, Article, MicroRNAs, nanotweezers, Nucleic Acids, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, miRNA biomarkers, TP248.13-248.65, Biomarkers, Biotechnology
multiplex sensing, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, DNA, biosensors, single-molecule FRET, Article, MicroRNAs, nanotweezers, Nucleic Acids, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, miRNA biomarkers, TP248.13-248.65, Biomarkers, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
