
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100591 , 10.1101/2022.04.20.488466 , 10.17863/cam.90610 , 10.17863/cam.91139
pmid: 36290559
pmc: PMC9598466
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100591 , 10.1101/2022.04.20.488466 , 10.17863/cam.90610 , 10.17863/cam.91139
pmid: 36290559
pmc: PMC9598466
Localising the sources of MEG/EEG signals often requires a structural MRI to create a head model, while ensuring reproducible scientific results requires sharing data and code. However, sharing structural MRI data often requires the face go be hidden to help protect the identity of the individuals concerned. While automated de-facing methods exist, they tend to remove the whole face, which can impair methods for coregistering the MRI data with the EEG/MEG data. We show that a new, automated de-facing method that retains the nose maintains good MRI-MEG/EEG coregistration. Importantly, behavioural data show that this “face-trimming” method does not increase levels of identification relative to a standard de-facing approach and has less effect on the automated segmentation and surface extraction sometimes used to create head models for MEG/EEG localisation. We suggest that this trimming approach could be employed for future sharing of structural MRI data, at least for those to be used in forward modelling (source reconstruction) of EEG/MEG data.
magnetoencephalography, Technology, QH301-705.5, T, data sharing, deidentification, magnetic resonance imaging, Biology (General), Article
magnetoencephalography, Technology, QH301-705.5, T, data sharing, deidentification, magnetic resonance imaging, Biology (General), Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
