
Marker-based Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems and associated musculoskeletal (MSK) modelling predictions offer non-invasively obtainable insights into muscle and joint loading at an in vivo level, aiding clinical decision-making. However, an OMC system is lab-based, expensive, and requires a line of sight. Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) techniques are widely-used alternatives, which are portable, user-friendly, and relatively low-cost, although with lesser accuracy. Irrespective of the choice of motion capture technique, one typically uses an MSK model to obtain the kinematic and kinetic outputs, which is a computationally expensive tool increasingly well approximated by machine learning (ML) methods. Here, an ML approach is presented that maps experimentally recorded IMC input data to the human upper-extremity MSK model outputs computed from (‘gold standard’) OMC input data. Essentially, this proof-of-concept study aims to predict higher-quality MSK outputs from the much easier-to-obtain IMC data. We use OMC and IMC data simultaneously collected for the same subjects to train different ML architectures that predict OMC-driven MSK outputs from IMC measurements. In particular, we employed various neural network (NN) architectures, such as Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) (vanilla, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Unit) and a comprehensive search for the best-fit model in the hyperparameters space in both subject-exposed (SE) as well as subject-naive (SN) settings. We observed a comparable performance for both FFNN and RNN models, which have a high degree of agreement (ravg,SE,FFNN=0.90±0.19, ravg,SE,RNN=0.89±0.17, ravg,SN,FFNN=0.84±0.23, and ravg,SN,RNN=0.78±0.23) with the desired OMC-driven MSK estimates for held-out test data. The findings demonstrate that mapping IMC inputs to OMC-driven MSK outputs using ML models could be instrumental in transitioning MSK modelling from ‘lab to field’.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, feed-forward neural network; gated recurrent unit; inertial motion capture; linear model; long short-term memory; machine learning; musculoskeletal modelling; optical motion capture; recurrent neural network; upper extremity, Technology, Computer Science - Machine Learning, QH301-705.5, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), gated recurrent unit, upper extremity, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Biology (General), optical motion capture, T, Image and Video Processing (eess.IV), musculoskeletal modelling, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Image and Video Processing, feed-forward neural network, linear model, machine learning, recurrent neural network, inertial motion capture, long short-term memory
FOS: Computer and information sciences, feed-forward neural network; gated recurrent unit; inertial motion capture; linear model; long short-term memory; machine learning; musculoskeletal modelling; optical motion capture; recurrent neural network; upper extremity, Technology, Computer Science - Machine Learning, QH301-705.5, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), gated recurrent unit, upper extremity, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Biology (General), optical motion capture, T, Image and Video Processing (eess.IV), musculoskeletal modelling, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Image and Video Processing, feed-forward neural network, linear model, machine learning, recurrent neural network, inertial motion capture, long short-term memory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
